Brass IMRT field compensator from .decimal, Inc. |
Compensator-based IMRT is purported to have several advantages over MLC-based IMRT, including:
- Being static, each field is delivered more quickly (also lower MU's).
- Fluence patterns can be closer to the ideal, i.e. not limited by leaf size, speed, or leakage.
- Potentially cheaper.
- Avoids field splitting. (Did I ever mention I hate split fields?!?)
Along with these advantages come possible drawbacks, including:
- Long fabrication times, versus automated MLC patterens.
- Therapists must change compensator for each field.
- Potential for beam hardening.
- Large size / weight to achieve low dose regions.
Compensators can be fabricated from a range of materials, including brass, Wood's metal (Cerrobend), PMMA (Plexiglas), and tungsten powder composite. Milling. molding, or stacking and bolting are possible fabrication techniques. A handful of companies sell custom fabricated IMRT compensators on demand, delivering within one or two days of order.
Do you have any experience with this technique?
Further reading:
- Chang, S., Cullip, T., Deschesne, K., Miller, E., & Rosenman, J. Compensators: An alternative IMRT delivery technique. Journal Of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 5(3), 2004. doi:10.1120/jacmp.v5i3.1965 (open access)
- P.C. Williams, IMRT: delivery techniques and quality assurance, British Journal of Radiology (2003) 76, 766-776, doi: 10.1259/bjr/12907222 (open access?)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.